论我国涉外民事诉讼中不对称管辖权条款的效力问题_.pdf

ABSTRACT

Asymmetricjurisdictioninforeign-relatedciviljurisdictionmeansthatthe

agreementbetweenthepartiesisthatonepartyhastherighttobringalawsuit

inanyothercourtwithjurisdictionotherthanthedesignatedcourt,butthe

otherpartycanonlybringalawsuitinthedesignatedcourt.Asoneofthetypes

ofagreementjurisdiction,asymmetricjurisdictionandagreementjurisdiction

bothshowremarkableadvantagesonthebasisofthepartiesautonomy.

However,thebasisofthecourt’sjurisdictionfromtheasymmetricjurisdiction

clausemadebythepartiesisthattheprovisionisvalid.Therefore,itis

necessarytoestablishtheeffectoftheasymmetricjurisdictionclause.

Atpresent,thereisnodirectlegalprovisionforasymmetricjurisdictionin

China.Injudicialpractice,thejudgmentsandrulingsonasymmetricjurisdiction

havedifferentresults.Inforeigncountries,althoughtheEUandtheHague

PrivateInternationalLawConferencehavetriedtolegislateonthe

effectivenessofasymmetricjurisdiction,therehasbeennolegislative

provisions.Injudicialpractice,differentcountriesreviewthevalidityofthe

clause,andtheresultsarealsodifferent.OnDecember31,2021,theSupreme

PeoplesCourtofficiallyissuedtheMinutesoftheMeetingoftheNational

SymposiumonForeignCommercialMaritimeTrialofCourts,whichputforward

thecontentoftheissueofthevalidityofasymmetricjurisdictionclauseforthe

firsttime,providingguidanceforsolvingtherelatedjurisdiction.Combined

withthiscontent,thispaperfocusesontheeffectivenessofasymmetric

jurisdictionclausefromtherelevantcasesofasymmetricjurisdictioninforeign

civiljurisdictioninChina.

Thispaperadoptsthemethodofempiricalresearch,literatureresearch,

thebasiccontentoftheasymmetricjurisdictioneffectaftercombing,through

theanalysisofChinainforeignciviljurisdictionasymmetricjurisdictio