文档详情

无创正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并呼吸衰竭患者护理综合干预效果评价.doc

发布:2018-09-08约8.82千字共17页下载文档
文本预览下载声明
无创正压通气治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病合并呼吸衰竭患者护理综合干预效果评价   [摘要] 目的 探讨护理干预对无创呼吸机治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)合并呼吸衰竭患者临床效果的影响。 方法 选取沈阳医学院附属中心医院2012年12月~2013年12月收治入院的COPD合并呼吸衰竭患者200例作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法随机分为观察组(100例)和对照组(100例),两组均给予无创正压通气治疗及常规护理干预,观察组在此基础上给予心理护理、呼吸道护理等综合护理干预,采用“SF-36量表”评价两组患者干预前后生活质量状况,并对两组患者对呼吸机辅助通气治疗依从性、护理满意度、临床血气分析、住院天数、呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率等进行分析比较。 结果 观察组患者干预后pH、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)明显高于干预前,而动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)明显低于干预前,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05);对照组患者干预后PaCO2明显低于干预前,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组患者干预后pH、PaO2、SaO2明显高于对照组,而PaCO2明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组患者住院时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组患者呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组患者干预后生理功能、总体健康、社会功能、情绪职能、精神健康等评分明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组患者依从性高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。观察组患者护理满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。 结论 有效的护理干预能提高COPD合并呼吸衰竭的生活质量、治疗依从性和临床疗效,减少有创机械通气给患者带来的创伤及并发症,缩短病程。   [关键词] 无创正压通气;慢性阻塞性肺疾病;呼吸衰竭;生活质量   [中图分类号] R473.5 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2015)10(a)-0151-05   Effect evaluation of comprehensive nursing intervention on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation treating COPD patients with respiratory failure   LU Dan   Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110024, China   [Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of nursing intervention clinical effect of noninvasive ventilation treating patients with COPD with respiratory failure. Methods From December 2012 to December 2013, in Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, 200 COPD patients with respiratory failure were selected as study subject, and they were divided into observation group (100 cases) and control group (100 cases) according to random number table, two groups were given the treatment of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and routine nursing intervention, the observation group given the comprehensive nursing intervention on the basis of control group including psychological nursing, respiratory tract nursing intervention and so on. The quality of life before and after intervention of the two groups was evaluated by S
显示全部
相似文档