the carbon_h-factor predicting individuals research impact at early stages of their careercarbon_h-factor预测个人在职业生涯的早期阶段研究的影响.pdf

The Carbon_h-Factor: Predicting Individuals’ Research Impact at Early Stages of Their Career Claus-Christian Carbon* Department of General Psychology and Methodology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany Abstract Assessing an individual’s research impact on the basis of a transparent algorithm is an important task for evaluation and comparison purposes. Besides simple but also inaccurate indices such as counting the mere number of publications or the accumulation of overall citations, and highly complex but also overwhelming full-range publication lists in their raw format, Hirsch (2005) introduced a single figure cleverly combining different approaches. The so-called h-index has undoubtedly become the standard in scientometrics of individuals’ research impact (note: in the present paper I will always use the term ‘‘research impact’’ to describe the research performance as the logic of the paper is based on the h-index, which quantifies the specific ‘‘impact’’ of, e.g., researchers, but also because the genuine meaning of impact refers to quality as well). As the h-index reflects the number h of papers a researcher has published with at least h citations, the index is inherently positively biased towards senior level researchers. This might sometimes be problematic when predictive tools are needed for assessing young scientists’ potential, especially when recruiting early career positions or equipping young scientists’ labs. To be compatible with the standard h-index, the proposed index integrates the scientist’s research age (Carbon_h-factor) into the h-index, thus reporting the average gain of h-index per year. Comprehensive calculations of the Carbon_h-factor were made for a broad variety of four research-disciplines (economics, neuroscience, physics and psychology) and for researchers performing on three high levels of research impact (substantial, out