物管案例分析：业主铲绿地盖“私堡”违法.doc

物管案例分析：业主铲绿地盖“私堡”违法 物管案例分析：业主铲绿地盖“私堡”违法提要：法院认为，公民的民事活动应遵守国家法律、法规及国家政策规定，不得损害社会公共利益。原告物业方系受委托进行小区物业管理的服务单位 来自地产E网 物管案例分析：业主铲绿地盖“私堡”违法 案例描述： 业主刘某2017年7月入住西青某小区。刘某住在一楼，阳台外是开发商为美观及供业主休憩而建造的小院，由木围栏圈成，地面覆盖绿化植被。刘某盯上这个小院，趁业主刚开始入住、小区内人较少的“时机”，陆续将小院内的绿地铲除，并将木围栏替换成砖结构，再用铝合金和玻璃等将小院封闭，原本属于业主共有的休憩场所如今却成为他自己房屋的一部分。 物业工作人员巡视中发现刘某行为，发出《装修违章整改通知书》，但刘某却毫无整改表示，物业遂起诉至西青法院。物业方认为，刘某擅自铲除绿化、拆除围栏，封闭属于公共区域的小院，严重影响小区景观和公共秩序，请求法院判令刘某拆除违章搭建的全部建筑和设施，恢复小院至原貌，包括复原绿化和植被。 法院判决： 法院认为，公民的民事活动应遵守国家法律、法规及国家政策规定，不得损害社会公共利益。原告物业方系受委托进行小区物业管理的服务单位，在物业共有设施遭受侵害时，有权代表业主主张权利。一楼小院为简易围栏圈设，属共有部分，业主可合理使用，但无权改变其设施状态和用途，被告无权改变建筑外檐自行搭建附属设施供个人使用。因此，被告应承担停止侵害、恢复诉争部位原状的责任。根据《物权法》相关规定，法院一审判决：被告刘某在判决生效后10日内自行拆除其在小院围栏内搭建的构筑设施，并将围栏、绿地等恢复原状态。 来自地产E网 Measures for the routine management of moral education in Middle SchoolsMethod of conventional management of moral education in middle schoolFirst, the guiding ideology:School moral education is an organic whole of the whole education work, always adhere to the school adhere to the moral education, education for this product, and actively promote the quality education, the school building efficient curriculum system of moral education, moral education, improve the sense of attraction and appeal, enhance the moral education work for through and timeliness. Teach everyone, service education and management education, and school moral education work must be with family education and community education closely together, to form a concerted pattern, and strive to create a good atmosphere for education, and to promote the all-round development of students, to establish a scientific moral education full of vigor the For long-term mechanism.Two, the goal of moral education:To guide the students to form the correct world outlook, outlook on life, values, to cultivate students unity and mutual assistance, honest and trustworthy, law-abiding, good quality, hard work, set a good XX students ideological quality, psychological quality and image quality. The formatio