Circulation:双联抗血小板治疗降低缺血性脑卒中复发风险.pdf
文本预览下载声明
Stroke
Early Dual Versus Mono Antiplatelet Therapy for
Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke or Transient
Ischemic Attack
An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ka Sing Lawrence Wong, FRCP; Yilong Wang, MD; Xinyi Leng, PhD; Chen Mao, PhD;
Jinling Tang, FFPH; Philip M.W. Bath, FRCP; Hugh S. Markus, FRCP;
Philip B. Gorelick, FACP; Liping Liu, MD; Wenhua Lin, PhD; Yongjun Wang, MD
Background—Emerging studies suggest that early administration of dual antiplatelet therapy may be better than monotherapy
for prevention of early recurrent stroke and cardiovascular outcomes in acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic
attack (TIA). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials evaluating dual versus mono antiplatelet
therapy for acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA.
Methods and Results—We assessed randomized, controlled trials investigating dual versus mono antiplatelet therapy
published up to November 2012 and the CHANCE trial (Clopidogrel in High-risk patients with Acute Non-disabling
Cerebrovascular Events), for efficacy and safety outcomes in adult patients with acute noncardioembolic ischemic stroke
or TIA with treatment initiated within 3 days of ictus. In total, 14 studies of 9012 patients were included in the systematic
review and meta-analysis. Dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced risk of stroke recurrence (risk ratio, 0.69;
95% confidence interval, 0.60–0.80; P0.001) and the composite outcome of stroke, TIA, acute coronary syndrome,
and all death (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.63–0.81; P0.001) when compared with monotherapy, and
nonsignificantly increased risk of major bleeding (ris
显示全部