Comparison of HEPAULPA Filter Test Standards Between USA and Europe.pdf
文本预览下载声明
Comparison Of HEPA/ULPA Filter Test Standards Between
America And Europe
Bin Zhou, Jinming Shen
Heating, Ventilation, Air-conditioning and Gas Institute, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Corresponding email: zhoubinwx@126.com
SUMMARY
This paper compares the difference of HEPA/ULPA filter test standards between America and
Europe from test procedures, aerosol types and its size, to air filter classification. Both of
them adopt MPPS method as their trend. According to EN1822, it is recommended to
combine the test rigs for efficiency test and leakage test in practice. Influence of different
scanning velocity on sampling accuracy, leakage and efficiency test accuracy need further
studied and reasonable scanning velocity should be fixed. According to Rongyi Zhao’s
theoretical analysis, dilution method to test high test aerosol concentration may not be correct,
and reasonable test methods instead of dilution need to be further studied.
INTRODUCTION
High efficiency particulate air filters (HEPA) and ultro-low penetrating particulate air filter
(ULPA) are widely used in pharmacy, hospital, food processing and microelectronics, they
are one of the most important terminals in clean space. In order to guarantee product quality
and environmental control, every country makes its strict test standards.
During the late 1950s, China adopted oil mist method from USSR. At the early 1960s, oil
mist method was improved to meet requirement of collective safeguard equipment and the
development of atomic energy engineering. In 1963 and 1965, sodium flame test rig was
successfully developed respectively to test filter media and HEPA. In 1970s, especially after
the economic reform and opening-up policy, oil mist method and sodium flame method were
used widely, therefore in 1980s national standard GB6165 was made using both methods.
As the development of microelectronics, the orginal standards using sodium salt and oil mist
are old-fashioned. Befor
显示全部