启功（Qi Gong）.doc

启功（Qi Gong） Mr. Qi Gong is a man of excellent character. This is the first thing to make clear. But good character does not necessarily shuppim is not picky, Mr Qi Gong has passed away, his calligraphy in the world, have independent character meaning, or it can be said that his character for the youth to learn calligraphy is not important, individually analyze the calligraphy is very necessary. My criticism of Mr. Qi Gong, of course, is also my attitude towards calligraphic criticism - to minimize some of his worst influences. So what are the bad influences of Mr. Qi Gong? Is the influence of some of the more influential calligraphers more subtle than Mr Qi Gong? Did ancient calligraphers have no bad influence? The question comes down to how we evaluate the good and bad effects of a calligrapher. What are the criteria? Before criticizing Mr. Qi Gongs calligraphy, I would like to explain the standards of what I call good influence and bad influence. First, the standard of breadth. This is the first criterion for the good influence of calligraphic works, even if the calligraphic works have obvious defects, but if it can be widely used, it can bring good effects. For example, Yuan Wei (Wei, Wei, Western Wei Dynasty inscriptions calligraphy), we can easily find the obvious flaws, but Weibei calligraphy broad, so we study the calligraphy of Northern Wei (the Northern Wei Dynasty in Weibei most outstanding) bad the impact is very small. But the bad influence of Tangkai than the much, reason is not what Tangkai obvious defects in the pursuit of practical significance on their symmetry is almost perfect, but because of its lack of broad, bad influence is relatively large, in Xi Tang Kai after it is difficult to write ancient script Portsmouth, to Tangkai based cursive easy sweet vulgar, and with Chinese learning is less cursive style bad habits. Relatively more than other famous Tang Dynastys broad, but because of his regular script techniques be too clear, it is easy to li