canopy leaf area index for apple tree.pdf
文本预览下载声明
C
p
C
a
N
b
c
a
A
R
R
2
A
K
A
A
C
G
H
L
1
a
t
o
w
a
c
m
t
e
R
i
m
b
0
hScientia Horticulturae 164 (2013) 610–615
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Scientia Horticulturae
journa l h om epa ge: www.elsev ier .com/ locate /sc ihor t i
anopy leaf area index for apple tree using hemispherical
hotography in arid region
hunwei Liua,b, Shaozhong Kangb,?, Fusheng Li c, Sien Lib, Taisheng Dub
Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, College of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,
anjing 210044, China
Center for Agricultural Water Research in China, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China
College of Agriculture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530005, China
r t i c l e i n f o
rticle history:
eceived 16 July 2013
eceived in revised form
8 September 2013
ccepted 4 October 2013
eywords:
nalysis software
pple orchard
anopy structure
ap fraction
emispherical image
a b s t r a c t
The hemispherical images of apple orchard were collected using fisheye lens in 2010 and then respec-
tively analyzed by the methods of Bonhom, 2000, 2000G, sphere, ellipse, LAI 2000-3 rings, LAI 2000-4
rings and Miller to obtain leaf area index (LAI), plant area index (PAI), gap fraction, leaf inclination angle
and clumping index in an arid region of northwest China. Results show that during DOY (day of year)
202–237 (at flourish stage), the estimated LAI by logarithmic ellipse method and PAI by LAI 2000-4 rings
method were 1.96 and 1.95 m2 m?2, respectively, which were close to the direct LAI (1.85 m2 m?2). How-
ever, the direct LAI was higher than the estimated LAI from ellipse method of Hemiview (1.59 m2 m?2)
and lower than the estimated PAI from gap fraction analysis method of Photoshop (2.67 m2 m?2). Thus the
methods of logarithmic ellipse and the LAI 2000-4 r
显示全部