论刑事诉讼侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人的权利保障讲述.doc

单位代码 03 学　　号 1101300007 分 类 号 D901 密 级 论刑事诉讼侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人的权利保障 院（系）名称 商贸学院法律系 专 业 名 称 法 学 学 生 姓 名 王 宇 指 导 教 师 李彦斌 2015年 5月10 日 论刑事诉讼侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人的权利保障 摘 要 中国现阶段正在进行司法改革，而对侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人的权利保障成为改革的重要部分，这也是世界刑法司法改革的趋势，更是我国未来刑事司法改革的方向。中国现阶段的法律实施情况很差劲，例如不能对自己的权利义务很好进行维护、打官司请律师还要受到非常多的制约、自己为自己辩护得不到重视、案件和自己无关但还是要回答的现象很普遍；公、检、法对诉讼阶段的措施实施不按规范进行。产生这些现象的根源有现阶段法制不健全的因素，比如检察机关认为公安机关在进行侦查时有违规行为，仅仅只能提建议，没有其他办法，而且如果公安机关不理不睬，检察机关也毫无办法，毕竟所属不同。尽管就公安机关在起诉阶段提出的非法证据检察机关可以拒绝作为证据，但是由于各种内部的规则因素，这种手段在司法实践中很少出现。特别是20世纪90年代我国提出依法治国方略以来，人权思想以成为法学家没理论研究的热点。但是我们要清楚地认识到我国人权制度还很落后，各方面都不完善，需要继续努力改善。 关键词：犯罪嫌疑人，侦查程序，权利保障 On?the criminal?investigation stage of?protection of the rights of criminal suspects Author:Wang Yu Tutor:Li Yanbin Abstract Protecting criminal’s legitimate right helps to implement the concept of human rights, and standardize the law enforcement on investigation authorities, and it also helps to improve Chinas international image. At present there are still some problems on the rights protection of suspects in the investigation stage, such as the suspects are not timely informed of their legitimate rights, their rights of hiring a lawyer to provide legal help are limited and the rights to self-defence are disconsidered, also the rights to refuse to answer questions unrelated to the case cannot be implemented. Besides, the coercive measures taken by investigation authorities are not standardized, also the phenomenon of torture, illegal search and seizure is widespread. These problems have been due to many reasons. Legislative has shortcomings, such as criminal suspects do not enjoy the Right to Remain Silent, evidence of illegal exclusionary rule is not established, investigators’ obligation to inform are not ordained, right