再论逻辑学与通识教育（On logic and general education）.doc

再论逻辑学与通识教育（On logic and general education） On logic and general education -- a discussion with Professor Wang Lu Abstract: the debate caused by substitution theory is a pseudo argument between confusing logic, specialized education and general education. The goal of logical instruction is to improve the quality of logical thinking. Logical thinking quality is the ability of daily logical thinking with general comparability. Modern logic pays attention to the logic of logic, ordinary logic concerns daily thinking, and the two often have different treatment of the same kind of knowledge involved in everyday thinking, and the general logic is suitable for general education. The slogan of logic modernization is aimed at the education of logic specialty. Emphasizing the antagonism between modern logic and general logic is a special phenomenon in Chinese academic circles, which makes the development and reform of logic and general education always have to defend for general logic. Key words: logical general education; logical thinking quality; critical thinking; modern logic and general logic Professor Wang Lus critical thinking (referred to as critical III criticism) presented a sharp criticism of the implement of critical thinking in Higher Education in the course of the foundation of philosophy, think this is after the absorption theory in the logic of university teaching of modern logic and a boycott. Wang Lu is characterized by sharp academic views and persistence. Persistence is firm, and sharpness is sharp. Strong and sharp, nature is prone to collision. Such a collision has two kinds, one kind is another type is Different people, different views.. In my opinion, the criticism of academic criticism mainly belongs to the latter. The critique is directly related to the relationship between modern logic and traditional logic. In fact, it involves how to understand and carry out the general education of logic in universities. This is obviously a lightweight problem, an