农村集体建设用地使用权流转制度效率研究——以广东省三市为例.pdf

摘 要 广东省自2001年起开始推行集体建设用地使用权流转制度。这项制度既取 得了一定的成效，也存在许多问题。本文借助制度经济学、西方经济学和土地 经济学理论，从制度效率的角度对该制度进行分析。本文构建了流转制度效率 的评价框架。对制度效率的评价可以从成本和收益两个维度展开，制度的成本 可以借助谈判成本、寻租成本和税费三个指标进行衡量，制度的收益可以从交 易主体的一致性、客体的一致性和交易过程的自由三个标准进行判断。 根据上述分析框架进行分析，流转制度相对其竞争性制度具有成本优势， 但是由于国家对宅基地流转的限制，其制度收益不足。在理论分析的基础上， 本文从两方面进行了实证检验。一方面是对流转制度实施情况的分析，另一方 面是对集体建设用地利用现状和潜力的研究。实证检验验证了制度效率分析的 结论。通过理论和实证研究本文得出结论：流转制度没有改变现有的集体建设 用地流转现状，这项制度也并没有真正实现同地同权同价。 关键词: 制度效率；集体建设用地；流转 2 ABSTRACT Guangdong Province started to promote the rights to use collective construction land circulation institution in 2001. The Institution got achievement and created many problems meanwhile. This paper analyzes the institution from the view of institutional efficiency with the theory of institutional economics, western economics and land economics. This paper constructs an evaluation framework of institution efficiency. The evaluation system of circulation institution efficiency divides into cost and revenue dimensions. The institutional cost dimension can divide into three indexes including negotiation cost, Rent-seeking cost and taxes and fees. The institution revenue dimension can be measured by 3 principles including the consistency of exchange subject, the consistency of exchange object and the degree-of-freedom of the exchange. The conclusion of the institutional efficiency analysis lists as follows: The circulation institution has an advantage of institutional cost. But the institutional revenu