中学生语文综合素质发展性评价初探（Development evaluation of Chinese comprehensive quality of middle school students）.doc

中学生语文综合素质发展性评价初探（Development evaluation of Chinese comprehensive quality of middle school students） Study on middle school students comprehensive quality evaluation of Chinese development 1 Lee Hui Lian Abstract: the deepening of the basic education curriculum reform, put forward a challenge to the traditional academic evaluation to test, test as the main method. Chinese academic evaluation of students, should be based on the overall quality of language including reading and writing and speaking ability, learning methods and habits, cooperation and communication ability, practice ability and innovation ability of Chinese language, as the evaluation object. According to comprehensive, subjectivity, advance principle. The evaluation method of assessment and evaluation of the quality of the multi subject combination, formative evaluation and summative evaluation, comprehensive evaluation, comprehensive and dynamic, in order to fully reflect the diagnosis and evaluation of the incentive function and feedback regulation function. Key words: Chinese comprehensive quality; development evaluation; qualitative evaluation With the deepening of Chinese curriculum reform, how to scientifically and reasonably evaluate the students quality problems has gradually been put on the agenda. Obviously, the traditional way of assessment of Chinese quality of students has been in many ways do not meet modern educational purpose and characteristics of Chinese education. First of all, monotone one-sided examination and evaluation methods in reality makes students, teachers, schools, parents and the whole society has formed a misunderstanding: the test scores of the students are good students; class average high teacher is a good teacher; the high school graduation rate is a good school. The quantitative score became the Lord of life, the distinction between good and bad standards. This negative impact is not only a result of heavy weight process evaluation methods deviated from the origina