战隼PK支点（Falcon PK）.doc

战隼PK支点（Falcon PK） Yoon yoon As representatives of the third generation of light fighters, the f-16 and mig a 29 have been equipped with many national air forces. So who is the real lightweight champion? There are a lot of fans who have used some common flight data to compare, and then judge the aircrafts close combat ability, such as climb rate, spiral radius, wing load, weight ratio and so on. But measuring the mobility of a modern fighter jet is far more complex than the simple basic flight data. Here, the author makes a simple analysis for the readers reference. Energy climb Energy rate of climb refers to the aircraft flight speed was multiplied by the residual thrust engine - the engine thrust and aircraft available resistance difference, divided by the weight of the plane (also known as specific gravity remaining power), is one of the important indicators to measure fighter maneuverability. In F - 16 and mig 29 energy rate of climb comparison on both sides, as a result of the media from different countries to provide relevant reference data is not the same, for different purposes, different countries, of course, most countries are Lao wang sells melons, puff, public information more or less have some water. Early in the conservative estimates, the authors refer to the relative authority of Janes defence weekly published early models flight data of both sides: in sea level, the early F a 16 type a half oil inside the machine without plugins to reach 326 m/s, when C because the tasks needed to increased weight gain, the maximum rate of climb down to about 305 m/SEC. In the early stages of mig 1:29, the maximum rate of climb was 320 m/s, and the improved model was due to increased weight. Therefore, in the energy climbing rate, the two sides are neck and neck. But in my opinion, one is to increase the weight ratio of the aircraft, and the other is to reduce the plane resistance. The former is to improve the thrust of the engine and reduce the weight of the aircraf