新民事诉讼证据规定下的当事人陈述规则之探讨.pdf

2021年1月黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报Jan.2021

第34卷第1期JournalofHeilongjiangVocationalInstituteofEcologicalEngineeringVol.34No.1

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-6341.2021.01.020

新民事诉讼证据规定下的当事人陈述规则之探讨

姜霜冬

(广西大学法学院,广西南宁5730004)

摘要:有关当事人陈述的立法规定少而粗糙,诚信风气的缺失导致实践中对其审查存在障碍,虚假陈述现象

层出不穷。为更好地规范民事诉讼秩序,2019年12月25日最高人民法院公布了修改后的《关于民事诉讼证据的

若干规定》,落实了当事人陈述义务,强化了法官的询问权,调整了当事人陈述的具结方式,明确了虚假陈述的制裁

措施。针对新规,分析缺漏,提出合理界定内涵、明确“有必要”情形、规范法条适用范围和多层次规制虚假陈述建

议,以期帮助法院正确查明事实,推动民事诉讼诚信制度的建设。

关键词:民事诉讼证据;当事人陈述;真实义务;虚假陈述

中图分类号:D915文献标识码:A文章编号:1674-6341(2021)01-0072-04

StudyontheRulesofParties’StatementundertheNewRules

ofEvidenceinCivilLitigation

JIANGShuang-dong

(GuangxiUniversity,Nanning530004,China)

Abstract:Thelegislativeprovisionsabouttheparties’statementsarefewandrough,thelackofintegrityatmosphere

leadstotheobstaclesinthepracticeofitsreview,falsestatementsemergeinendlessly.Inordertobetterregulatetheorder

ofcivillitigation,onDecember26,2019,theSupremePeople’sCourtpromulgatedanumberofrevisedprovisionsonevi-

denceincivillitigation,implementtheparties’obligationtostate,strengthenthejudge’sstatementbythepartiesrights,

adjustingthewayofguarantee,makeclearthesanctionsoffalsestatements.Inordertohelpthecourtfindoutthefactscor-

rectlyandpromotetheconstructionoftheintegritysystemincivillitigation,thispaperputsforwardsomesuggestionsonrea-

sonablydefiningtheconnotationofthesituation,clarifyingthe“necessary”situation,standardizingthescopeofapplication

ofthelawandmulti-levelregulationoffalsestatements.

Keywords:Evidenceincivilprocedure;Litigantstatement;True